\section{Conclusion}

The KFD Foundation Triad is not a request to value facts, trust, and
cooperation. It is an account of three roles through which persistent work can
remain one shared world across participants and time.

KFD-1 preserves continuity of admitted state and occurrence. KFD-2 turns that
world into bounded, revisable permission to rely. KFD-3 turns warranted value
into coordinated action without reducing independent participants to captive
execution surfaces. Cooperation then produces new occurrences and
consequences, which return through review and admission to a successor fact
cut.

The resulting loop explains both the triad's minimality claim and its
generative force:

\begin{equation}
\text{Facts} \rightarrow \text{Trust} \rightarrow \text{Cooperation}
\rightarrow \text{New Facts}.
\end{equation}

Remove stable facts and trust attaches to narrative. Remove warranted trust
and facts remain inert or require repeated reconstruction. Remove
trusted-value cooperation and an inspectable system can still obtain
compliance but cannot account for durable joint generation. Reverse the order
and authority, reputation, capture, or self-certification fills the missing
layer.

The first derived pressures follow from operating the loop, not from expanding
a list of values. Facts are viewed from declared perspectives; surprising
consequences expose missing objects; repeated causal experience raises the
possibility and risk of autonomous discovery. KFD-4, KFD-5, and the draft
KFD-6 begin that next inquiry.

The foundation remains falsifiable. Another model may preserve the same
continuities more economically, and independent evidence may show that this
decomposition does not generalize. Until then, the triad provides a compact
engineering test for any system that claims its work can outlive the session:
can a later participant recover the world, reconstruct why it may be trusted,
and choose how to extend it so that the result becomes inspectable reality for
whoever comes next?
